I had the great good fortune recently to spend a lunch hour
with Richard Morrison from Kapiti Coast District Council (KCDC). On the surface
this may not appear exciting, but the meeting had two things going for it: the
lunch was free (thanks to Judith Timpany at the Whanganui Community
Foundation), and Richard is the Eco Design Advisor for KCDC. Sharon Duff, from
the Primary Health Organisation, invited me to the meeting that was also
attended by two representatives from Wanganui District Council, a pair of local
builders, herself and Judith.
There is a phrase in our household we use to describe
special people: “She/he is the real (sometimes additional word inserted here)
deal.” Richard is all that and a bag of chips.
He is passionate, knowledgeable and generous with his time.
Richard took an entire day out of his busy schedule to travel to Wanganui and
share his perspectives on warm, healthy, low energy homes.
Our patch before
Our patch after
As I’ve tried to emphasize in this column, Richard’s
presentation highlighted the economic savings associated with eco-design.
Rising power bills concern us both. While I have written that electricity rates
are on track to double in the next 10 years, Richard shared information that
they could double in as little as eight! In in the case of our household, a
rise from $22/month to $44/month would not break the bank, but for families
paying $300, a rise to $600 could be devastating. When this is added to the
recent radical increases in homeowners’ insurance, the effects could be profoundly
negative for local businesses due to less available ‘disposable income’ of the
average Wanganui resident.
And beyond that, as electric rates rise, more people may
choose not to heat their homes because they cannot afford to. This would
exacerbate an already major challenge facing New Zealand: health problems
associated with cool, damp homes. Here is some information from the Eco Design
Advisor Network (Participating Councils: Auckland, Hamilton, Palmerston North,
Kapiti Coast, Lower Hutt, and Nelson):
New Zealand homes are generally
cold, damp, unhealthy and inefficient in energy and water use:
• NZ homes are on average 6
degrees Celsius below World Health Organization recommended minimum
temperatures in winter.
• 80% of NZ homes are inadequately
insulated.
• 45% of NZ homes are mouldy.
• NZ has the second highest rate
of asthma in the world, and an excess winter mortality of 1600, a much higher
rate than other OECD countries.
• Cold, damp homes pose serious
health risks, particularly for the most vulnerable groups in the community who
spend the most time at home.
Unhealthy homes clearly cost the health system, but also
cost the economy through lost productivity due to worker illness.
Sustainability is often presented as a triangle including environmental
quality, human needs, and economic viability. This is a model I have used as a
teacher for 20 years.
But the more I learn about the majority of housing stock
in New Zealand, a different triangle comes to my mind – a sort of Bermuda
Triangle where things such as money and health disappear. The three points of
this sub-standard housing triangle are: Unhealthy, Inefficient, Wasteful.
The Eco Design Advisors are doing amazing work to combat the
Bermuda Triangle of New Zealand homes, and rescuing families from the
netherworld of cold and mould. Learn more at their website:
www.ecodesignadvisor.org.nz
Thanks again to Richard for taking the time to share his
insights with our community. Chur, bro!
Peace, Estwing
No comments:
Post a Comment